architectural photography of trial court interior view
architectural photography of trial court interior view

Request for Extension of Appeal Period Submitted via Prison Officer

The Supreme Court ruled that a defendant’s appeal filed after the extended deadline should be accepted because the delay was due to force majeure—an uncontrollable circumstance.

Key Points:

  • The defendant requested an extension to appeal through a prison officer within the original deadline.

  • The court granted the extension, but the prison officer received the order after the extended deadline had passed.

  • The defendant filed the appeal soon after learning about the extension, but it was rejected by the Appeals Court Region 7 for being late.

  • The Supreme Court held that the late receipt of the court’s order by prison staff constituted force majeure, excusing the delay.

  • Thus, the trial court was permitted to allow another extension, and the appeal was deemed valid.

  • The Supreme Court ordered the Appeals Court to reconsider the case on its merits.

Legal Basis:

  • Criminal Procedure Code, Section 15 (Force majeure)

  • Civil Procedure Code, Section 23 (Time limit extensions

Outcome:

The Supreme Court overturned the Appeals Court’s rejection and instructed it to review the defendant’s appeal.